Your customers expect you to have an AppSec program.
Eureka helps software teams stand up the AppSec workflow, remediation history and evidence customers expect during security reviews, vendor questionnaires, procurement reviews and SOC 2 evidence asks.
You cannot rebuild customer assurance evidence after the fact
Customer security reviews, SOC 2 evidence requests, and enterprise security questionnaires get harder when evidence is scattered across scanner outputs, tickets, screenshots, and shared folders. Eureka captures AppSec evidence as work happens, so teams are not forced to reconstruct what happened after the fact.
Screenshots everywhere
Application security activity gets buried across pull requests, scan outputs, tickets, and shared folders.
No clear decision trail
You know a finding moved forward, but not always who decided, when, or why.
Hard to show later
If you have not collected evidence as the work happened, it's hard to show a repeatable process after the fact.
Findings · reviews · approvals · decisions · audit history
The secure SDLC process customers and SOC 2 reviewers expect to see
Your GRC platform manages the compliance program. Eureka supplies the application security workflow evidence underneath it: findings, reviews, approvals, and decisions documented as work happens.
Eureka supports the application security side of compliance. It does not replace your GRC platform, auditor or certification process.
Every code change is tied to a tracked ticket, pull request, or work item.
Application security checks run before release.
Pull requests show review and approval before deployment.
Changes move through separated development, test, and production environments, with evidence that the process was followed.
Evidence builds as findings move through the workflow
Eureka captures how findings move from detection to triage, remediation, review and approval, creating the audit trail as work happens instead of rebuilding it later.
Detected
Vulnerability surfaced from a scan or connected tool.
Triaged
Risk decision recorded with remediation expectations.
Assigned
Ownership and timing attached to the finding.
Remediated
Fixed, accepted, deferred, or tagged for follow-up.
Reviewed
Decision reviewed and approved where required.
Captured
Workflow history becomes evidence in the audit report.
AppSec expertise built in
Built by practitioners who helped shape OWASP ASVS and SPVS—and who have run application security programs in the field.
Eureka turns that experience into a practical workflow teams can use from first finding through review, remediation and approval.
Know where application findings stand
See which findings are open, reviewed, accepted, or resolved based on real workflow activity, not spreadsheet tracking or disconnected scanner output.
What customer security reviewers and SOC 2 auditors actually need to see
Not scanner exports. Not screenshots. Not last-minute spreadsheets. Reviewers need evidence that your secure SDLC process was followed.
Every code change is tied to a tracked ticket.
Security checks show changes were tested before release.
Changes were reviewed and approved by someone other than the author.
Evidence shows changes moved through separate environments.
Findings · reviews · approvals · decisions · audit history
Scanners alone do not show a repeatable customer-assurance process
Scanners help surface vulnerabilities. Customer security reviewers and SOC 2 auditors need evidence that findings were reviewed, tracked, handled, and documented through a repeatable secure SDLC process.
| Capability | Eureka | Scanners | Manual process |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finds application vulnerabilities | Yes | Yes | No |
| Unifies findings across tools | Yes | Limited | No |
| Connects findings to workflow evidence | Yes | Limited | Manual |
| Tracks review and remediation status | Yes | Partial | Manual |
| Shows decision trail per finding | Yes | No | Screenshot scramble |
| Produces review-friendly SDLC evidence | Yes | No | Rebuilt after the fact |
Customer assurance starts before the review.
The strongest response is assembled during the work—not reconstructed when a questionnaire arrives.
Capture the work
Findings enter a traceable record as soon as they are identified.
Preserve the decisions
Reviews, approvals and exceptions stay connected to the work.
Respond with confidence
Give customers and auditors a clear, exportable history without chasing screenshots.
Frequently asked questions.
Common questions about customer assurance, SOC 2, application security evidence, and enterprise reviews.
Often, yes. Customers and auditors may ask how you test applications, track vulnerabilities, remediate findings, approve changes, and document security decisions.
Reviewers often want evidence of scanning, vulnerability tracking, ownership, remediation status, pull request review, approval, risk acceptance, validation, and a repeatable secure development process.
No. Eureka supports the AppSec evidence layer beneath those workflows. GRC platforms manage the broader compliance program; Eureka helps supply the application security record.
Yes. Eureka can help organize current scan results, remediation status, decisions, and available evidence. Going forward, it captures the record as work happens.
A scanner shows what was found. Customer-assurance evidence shows what your team did about it: review, priority, ownership, remediation, approval, acceptance, and validation.
They look for a repeatable process: planned work, tested code, reviewed changes, tracked vulnerabilities, documented decisions, and evidence that security issues are handled consistently.
If you can’t show what happened, your team has to rebuild the story later.
Start collecting AppSec evidence as findings move through review, remediation, approval, and validation.